<!doctype html>
<html lang="en">
<head>
  <meta charset="utf-8">
  <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
  <title>calm_college-truth.txt</title>
  <script>
    (() => {
      let storedTheme = null;
      try {
        storedTheme = localStorage.getItem("theme");
      } catch (error) {}

      if (storedTheme === "dark") {
        document.documentElement.dataset.theme = "dark";
      }
    })();
  </script>
  <link rel="stylesheet" href="/%25latex/styles.css">
</head>
<body class="document-page">
  <button class="theme-toggle" type="button" aria-label="Switch to dark mode" title="Dark mode">
    <svg class="theme-icon theme-icon-moon" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true">
      <path d="M20.4 14.5A8.2 8.2 0 0 1 9.5 3.6a8.7 8.7 0 1 0 10.9 10.9Z"></path>
    </svg>
    <svg class="theme-icon theme-icon-sun" viewBox="0 0 24 24" aria-hidden="true">
      <circle cx="12" cy="12" r="4"></circle>
      <path d="M12 2v2M12 20v2M4.9 4.9l1.4 1.4M17.7 17.7l1.4 1.4M2 12h2M20 12h2M4.9 19.1l1.4-1.4M17.7 6.3l1.4-1.4"></path>
    </svg>
  </button>
  <script>
    (() => {
      const button = document.querySelector(".theme-toggle");

      const setTheme = (theme) => {
        const isDark = theme === "dark";
        if (isDark) {
          document.documentElement.dataset.theme = "dark";
        } else {
          document.documentElement.removeAttribute("data-theme");
        }

        button.setAttribute("aria-label", isDark ? "Switch to light mode" : "Switch to dark mode");
        button.setAttribute("aria-pressed", String(isDark));
        button.title = isDark ? "Light mode" : "Dark mode";

        try {
          localStorage.setItem("theme", isDark ? "dark" : "light");
        } catch (error) {}
      };

      setTheme(document.documentElement.dataset.theme === "dark" ? "dark" : "light");
      button.addEventListener("click", () => {
        setTheme(document.documentElement.dataset.theme === "dark" ? "light" : "dark");
      });
    })();
  </script>
  <header class="site-header">
    <a class="back-link" href="/outline/calm_college/">Back to directory</a>
    <h1>calm_college-truth.txt</h1>
    <p class="path-label">outline/calm_college/calm_college-truth.txt</p>
  </header>
  <main class="document-shell">
    <pre class="document-text">## calm.college

### Truth

Most university students avoid official campus events because the events feel disconnected from their real needs.


#### Lonely

	avoidance
		people arrive tyred, overloaded, and a little rushed
		most students move through campus quickly — lectures, work, home
		when life feels stretched, meeting people feels heavier than it should
		small irritations land harder because no one has the bandwidth to smooth them out
			why?
				steady pressure from study, work, commuting, and screens
				less practice resolving small things face to face
				leads to small annoyances feeling larger
			example: university library hotline (real)
				intended for maintenance issues
				received gum-chewing complaints instead
			result → irritation reported, not resolved socially
			links to wider trend of outrage filling social gaps
		so students keep to themselves, not because they want to, but because it feels safer and easier in a busy day

	transactional
		most interactions happen around tasks — assignments, counters, timetable logistics
		the social world feels eroded; everything efficient, but thin
		the campus rhythm that once held people together has faded over years
			fewer informal spaces
			more online administration
			less sense of a shared day
		even before COVID, many students felt like they “knew people” without actually feeling connected to anyone
			why?
				large class sizes
				commuter culture
				shift to online systems
				less informal space for friendships
		the Facebook succeeded early on because it matched a campus that already felt alive in person
			you saw what friends were doing and met them there
			it amplified real contact rather than replacing it
		through the 2010s this balance shifted
			not dramatically — just quietly, year by year
			more looking, less joining
			more awareness of others, but less conversation with them
		COVID accelerated this decline
			more online lectures, fewer casual encounters
			cost of living rising, students working longer hours
			commuters might miss events and leave quickly
		loneliness became normal long before the pandemic

	longing
		beneath all of this is a quiet wish for connection
		students want small, human moments — not performances, not big commitments
		time feels tight, energy feels thin, and most social formats feel too demanding
		drawn to low-stakes activities as safe entry points
		feeling purposeless without shared meaning
		the desire for community is still strong
			it just needs a format that fits the emotional reality of modern student life


#### Events

	clash
		getting to any event is already uphill
		most students carry long days — study, work, commuting, deadlines, and the small frictions in between
		by the time something is scheduled, there’s very little energy left
		even a simple trip across campus feels heavier than it should
		so attendance isn’t about interest; it’s about capacity
		and most people simply don’t have much left

	institutional
		university-run events come from good intentions, but the format works against them
		they’re planned far in advance, built around imagined student needs, and shaped by branding or engagement targets
		this makes them feel polished yet distant — an extension of marketing rather than a natural part of campus life
		the options tend to fall into two extremes:
			a self-improvement seminar,
			or an alcohol-centred social night
		both can be fine, but neither fits easily into the real rhythm of a student’s day
		and because they’re scheduled, they automatically carry the feeling of obligation:
			“you should go,” rather than “you can drop in if you want”

	communal
		the things that actually feel alive on campus are rarely official
		they’re small, unstructured moments that grow out of the day itself
		students meeting with no script,
		people sharing a space without needing to perform,
		activities that don’t ask for a big emotional shift to join
		there’s no pressure to stay, no pressure to impress, no pressure at all
		just ordinary people doing something simple, with room for others to slip in quietly if they want
		this softer social layer is what students recognise as real community

	universities have small successes with activity-based gatherings
		things with hands — painting, cooking, crafts, simple games — lower the pressure and give conversation a sideways entry point
		no one has to announce themselves or carry the room; they can just be there
		these formats don’t fix everything, but they’re closer to the emotional reality of modern student life
		and they show the one pattern that consistently works:
			keep it human, low-stakes, and easy to join


#### Designing software for universities

universities already run on software

logins
	
what software actually needs
	students


##### How do organisations verify someone is a uni student?

		.edu email
			the simplest method, but not reliable
			some high schools use .edu addresses
			many universities issue lifetime alumni emails
			others leave old student accounts active for years
			so an email alone can’t confirm if someone is a current student
			it’s too broad and too inconsistent for a campus-only tool

		eduGAIN
			the trusted, modern way universities confirm student status
			a global network that lets a student log in through their own university’s portal
			the university then confirms only the essentials:
				“this person is an active student here”
			no names, no emails, no unnecessary details

			this is the same backbone used by research platforms and academic tools
			not because they need personal data, but because federation keeps identity simple and secure

			join by a federation
				each country has its own federation; in Australia this is the AAF
				joining means:
					registering as a Service Provider,
					securing login endpoints,
					and requesting only minimal attributes
				once approved, you can be exposed to eduGAIN globally
				from there, universities worldwide can recognise the login instantly

			what details do you get?
				– a pseudonymous identifier (unique to your service)
				– a basic role (student, staff, etc.)
				sometimes an affiliation type
				no personal identifiers are shared
				and calm.college does not need any


##### What software actually needs

		only two questions:
			“is this person a current student?”
			“which campus are they from?” (hashed and never exposed)

		the system never sees or stores real identity
		the pseudonymous identifier is kept only long enough to enforce basic safety
		and even then, it cannot be linked back to a real person by calm.college itself

###### Why This Identifier Matters
		it creates a narrow, double-layer protection:
			– a piece of software cannot identify a student
			– only the university can, and only from its side
		this prevents misuse in both directions
			a platform cannot dox a student,
			and a university cannot reach into the platform’s data unless there is a genuine, severe incident

		in the rare case of serious harm
			calm.college can pass the pseudonymous token to the university’s safety team
			they, and only they, can resolve it internally if needed
			the platform never handles names or personal data
			and routine disagreements, criticism, or ordinary conflict cannot be escalated

		the principle is simple:
			store almost nothing,
			verify only what’s necessary,
			and keep students protected from both impersonation and unwanted exposure



#### What institutions currently pay for

    current spend
        universities already invest heavily in student engagement and wellbeing
        most use survey platforms such as Qualtrics and CultureAmp
            these cost anywhere from ~$50k–$200k per year
        they also pay for analytics tied to learning systems or CRMs
            usually charged on a per-student basis (~$2–$5 annually)

    why universities rely on these tools
        surveys are familiar, easy to justify, and fit neatly into reporting frameworks
        they produce numbers that look official — charts, benchmarks, and year-on-year comparisons
        they slot cleanly into governance cycles:
            strategic plans,
            accreditation reviews,
            and annual wellbeing reports
        on paper, they offer certainty and structure

    survey limitations
        but in practice, surveys measure only the surface
            self-reported attitudes,
            snapshots of mood,
            and what students think they “should” say
        response rates are low
            especially among the students who feel most disconnected
        questions are answered alone, not observed in context
            so the data is abstracted from real campus life
        surveys can tell you whether students feel isolated
            but not how often they meet others,
            how they use campus spaces,
            or where the quiet successes or pain points actually are
        this leaves institutions with a sense of responsibility
            but not much clarity

    reporting needs
        wellbeing and engagement are now tied to:
            retention,
            funding,
            quality assurance,
            and legal duty of care
        institutions must show they’re taking real steps to support students
        but their current tools mostly report how students feel,
        not how they actually live day-to-day

    why this matters financially
        retention
            every student who leaves early represents lost revenue
            even a small improvement can mean millions for a mid-sized university

        funding and rankings
            many national frameworks link funding to student progression and outcomes
            wellbeing initiatives can be cited as evidence of institutional commitment

        reputation and recruitment
            international students in particular pay attention to wellbeing scores
            poor outcomes can damage a university’s position in global markets

        risk management
            universities carry responsibility for student welfare
            they need clear, reliable signals that show where support is required
            current survey-based tools leave large blind spots


##### Health and learning outcomes

	mental health
		universities collect all this data and run events they think students might like
		the stated purpose is improving mental health

	learning outcomes
		better wellbeing leads directly to better learning outcomes
			higher degree completion
			lower dropout rate

	revenue
		which also improves revenue
			retained students mean continued tuition and funding

	leadership case
		so better data is a no-brainer from the vice chancellor's perspective
			improving mental health
			improving learning outcomes
			and this holds across currency and equity differences worldwide
</pre>
  </main>
  <footer class="site-footer">
    <a class="back-link" href="/outline/calm_college/">Back to directory</a>
  </footer>
</body>
</html>
